The product, screen by screen

Every case, and what is about to fall due

Each case carries its procedure type, its docket number, the parties, the court that hears it and its procedural status. The header at the top is the one thing a litigator checks every morning: how many deadlines fall inside the next seven days, and whether anything has already expired.

The two entries under Próximos vencimientos are computed, not typed in: the application derived them from the procedural stage each case is in.

One case, and the computation behind it

This is the half of the product that had no tool in Venezuela. From the procedure type and the acts already recorded, the engine builds the whole chain of deadlines: which stage is running, under which articles, when it opened and when it closes — counted against the business days of the specific court, with its holidays and judicial recesses.

The panel at the bottom of the capture is the lapsing of the action under Article 267 of the Code of Civil Procedure: the application states the date, the days remaining, and the act it is counting from — because the rule counts from the last act of the parties, and a judge's decision in between does not reset it.

Analizar este caso con IA is where the two halves meet: it takes the case file and searches the corpus for the Supreme Court precedent that governs it, citing each decision. That is the feature that runs on Gemini models on Vertex AI.

Every milestone of every case, on one month

The same computation, seen from the calendar instead of from the case: every milestone the lawyer has access to — their own and their team's — on a month view, colour-coded by how close it is.

The second tab, Días de Despacho, is the raw material: the days each court actually sat. Deadlines in Venezuelan procedure do not run on calendar days, and a court that did not sit does not consume one.

Venezuelan law, structured and queryable

The other half of the application. The judicial archive of Venezuela is public and enormous, and none of it is queryable as data: the Supreme Court publishes through search portals of limited scope, and the Official Gazette is not structured at all.

Eight ways into the same base — by legal holding, by decision, by statute, by justice, by trial judge, by counsel, by party, and a natural language question whose answer cites the decisions it rests on. The top card is what came in this week: the corpus grows every week, and the application says so rather than pretending to be complete.

The figures on the card move as the pipeline processes the archive, so they are lower here than on the company page, which states today's numbers. Everything in it is public information from official sources — the Supreme Court of Justice, the National Assembly and the National Printing Office.

Clients, proposals, fees and team

A small practice does not run a separate system for this. Clients and their documents, proposals with their approval and their instalments, fees charged and expenses paid, by month and by year — and collaborators, with twenty-two distinct permissions granted per case.

The amounts in the capture are demonstration data on the account the screenshots were taken from. The disclaimer at the foot of the screen is in the product itself: this is internal control, not tax invoicing.